Full text | References (item 2 of 3) for monograph on the she-philosopher in popular science (1985)

Algarotti, Francesco. Sir Isaac Newton’s Philosophy Explain’d For the Use of the Ladies. In Six Dialogues on Light and Colours. From the Italian of Sig. Algarotti. 2 vols. Trans. Elizabeth carter. London: Printed for E. Cave et al, 1739.

Anderson, Wilda C. “The Rhetoric of Scientific Language: An Example from Lavoisier.” Modern Language Notes 96.4(May 1981):746–770.

Behn, Aphra. “Translator’s Preface.” In A Discovery of New Worlds. To which is prefixed a Preface by way of Essay on Translated Prose; wherein the Arguments of Father “Tacquet” and others, against the System of “Copernicus” (as to the Motion of the Earth) are likewise considered and answered: Wholly new. By Bernard Le Bovier de Fontenelle. London: Printed for William Canning, 1688.

Benamou, Michel. “Notes on the Technological Imagination.” In The Technological Imagination: Theories and Fictions. Eds. Teresa De Lauretis, Andreas Huyssen, and Kathleen Woodward. Madison: Coda Press, Inc., 1980, 65–83.

Berman, Morris. “‘Hegemony’ and the Amateur Tradition in British Science.” The Journal of Social History 8.2(Winter 1975):30–43.

Bloch, Ruth H. “Untangling the Roots of Modern Sex Roles: A Survey of Four Centuries of Change.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 4.2(Winter 1978):237–252.

Bovenschen, Silvia. “Is There a Feminine Aesthetic?” Trans. Beth Weckmueller. New German Critique 10(Winter 1977):111–137.

Boyle, Robert. Experiments and Considerations Touching Colours. First occasionally written, among some other “Essays,” to a Friend; and now suffered to come abroad as The Beginning of an Experimental History of Colours. In vol. I of The Works. Ed. Thomas Birch. 5 vols. 3rd ed. London: 1744; rpt. Germany: Georg Olms Verlagsbuchhandlung, 1965, 662–788.

Bridenthal, Renate and Claudia Koonz, eds. “Introduction.” Becoming Visible: Women in European History. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, 1977.

Brink, J. R. “Bathsua Makin: Scholar and Educator of the Seventeenth Century.” International Journal of Women’s Studies 1.4(July/August 1978):417–26.

Bush, Corlann Gee. “Women and the Assessment of Technology: to Think, to Be; to Unthink, to Free.” In Machina Ex Dea: Feminist Perspectives on Technology. Ed. Joan Rothschild. New York: Pergamon Press, 1983, 151–170.

Capp, Bernard. English Almanacs 1500–1800: Astrology and the Popular Press. New York: Cornell University Press, 1979.

Cavendish, Margaret. The Description of a New World, Called The Blazing-World. Written by the Thrice Noble, Illustrious, and Excellent Princesse, the Duchess of Newcastle. London: Printed by A. Maxwell, 1668.

-----. Grounds of Natural Philosophy: Divided into Thirteen Parts: With an Appendix Containing Five Parts. The second Edition, much altered from the First, which went under the Name of Philosophical and Physical opinions. Written by the Thrice Noble, Illustrious, and Excellent Princess, the Duchess of Newcastle. London: Printed by A. Maxwell, 1668.

-----. The Life of William Cavendish, Duke of Newcastle. To Which Is Added the True Relation of My Birth, Breeding, and Life. Ed. C. H. Firth. 5th ed. 1667; rpt. London: John C. Nimmo, 1886.

-----. Natures Picture Drawn by Fancies Pencil To the Life. Being several Feigned Stories, Comical, Tragical, Tragi-Comical, Poetical, Romancical, Philosophical, Historical, and Moral: Some in Verse, some in Prose; some Mixt, and some by Dialogues. Written by the Thrice Noble, Illustrious, and most Excellent Princess, the Duchess of Newcastle. The Second Edition. 1656; rpt. London: Printed by A. Maxwell, 1671.

-----. Philosophical and Physical Opinions. Written by the Thrice Noble, Illustrious, and Excellent Princess, the Lady Marchioness of Newcastle. London: Printed by William Wilson, 1663.

-----. Sociable Letters. Menston, England: The Scolar Press, Ltd., 1969. Facs. rpt. of CCXI Sociable Letters (London: William Wilson, 1664).

Clark, Alice. Working Life of Women in the Seventeenth Century. 2nd ed. 1919; rpt. New York: Augustus M. Kelley, 1968.

A Collection of Letters and Poems: Written by several Persons of Honour and Learning, Upon divers Important Subjects, to the Late Duke and Dutchess of Newcastle. 2nd ed. 1676; rpt. London: Printed for Langly Curtis, 1678.

Cowley, Abraham. “To the Royal Society.” In History of the Royal Society. By Thomas Sprat. Eds. Jackson I. Cope and Harold Whitmore Jones. 1958; rpt. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, Ltd., 1966. Facs. rpt. of original 1667 edition.

Dickason, Anne. “Anatomy and Destiny: The Role of Biology in Plato’s Views of Women.” The Philosophical Forum 5.1(Fall 1973):45–53.

Easlea, Brian. Witch-Hunting, Magic and the New Philosophy: An Introduction to Debates of the Scientific Revolution, 1450–1750. New Jersey: Humanities Press, Inc., 1980.

Fausto-Sterling, Anne. “Women and Science.” Women’s Studies International Quarterly 4.1(1981):41–50.

Fee, Elizabeth. “Is Feminism a Threat to Objectivity?” International Journal of Women’s Studies 4.4(September/October 1981):378–92.

Ferguson, Eugene S. “The Mind’s Eye: Nonverbal Thought in Technology.” Science 197.4306 (26 August 1977):827–836.

Fontenelle, Bernard Le Bovier de. A Discovery of New Worlds. Trans. Aphra Behn. London: Printed for William Canning, 1688.

Fraser, Antonia. The Weaker Vessel: Woman’s Lot in Seventeenth-Century England. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1984.

Gagen, Jean Elisabeth. The New Woman: Her Emergence in English Drama, 1600–1730. New York: Twayne Publishers, 1954.

Gallop, Jane. “Snatches of Conversation.” In Women and Language in Literature and Society. Eds. Sally McConnell-Ginet, Ruth Borker, and Nelly Furman. New York: Praeger Publishers, 1980, 274–283.

Gearhart, Sally M. “An End to Technology: A Modest Proposal.” In Machina Ex Dea: Feminist Perspectives on Technology. Ed. Joan Rothschild. New York: Pergamon Press, 1983, 171–182.

Gillespie, Gerald. “Scientific Discourse and Postmodernity: Francis Bacon and the Empirical Birth of ‘Revision.’” Boundary 2: A Journal of Postmodern Literature 7.2(Winter 1979):118–148.

Goodman, Madeleine J. and Lenn Evan Goodman. “Is There a Feminist Biology?” International Journal of Women’s Studies 4.4(September/October 1981):393–413.

Grant, Douglas. Margaret the First: A Biography of Margaret Cavendish, Duchess of Newcastle, 1623–1673. London: Rupert Hart-Dav1s, 1957.

Hacker, Sally L. “Mathematization of Engineering: Limits on Women and the Field.” In Machina Ex Dea: Feminist Perspectives on Technology. Ed. Joan Rothschild. New York: Pergamon Press, 1983, 38–58.

Harris, John. Astronomical Dialogues between a Gentleman and a Lady: Wherein the Doctrine of the Sphere, Uses of the Globes, And the Elements of Astronomy and Geography are Explain’d, In a Pleasant, Easy and Familiar Way. With a Description of the Famous Instrument, called the Orrerry. London: Printed by T. Wood for Benj. Cowse, 1719.

Hein, Hilde. “Women and Science: Fitting Men to Think about Nature.” International Journal of Women’s Studies 4.4(September/October 1981):369–377.

Hill, Christopher. The World Turned Upside Down: Radical Ideas during the English Revolution. New York: The Viking Press, 1972.

Hooke, Robert. Micrographia: Or Some Physiological Descriptions of Minute Bodies Made By Magnifying Glasses with Observations and Inquiries thereupon. In vol. 13 of Early Science in Oxford. Ed. R. T. Gunther. 2nd ed. Oxford, 1938; rpt. London: Dawsons of Pall Mall, 1968. Facs. rpt. of orginial edition (London: Printed by John Martyn and James Allestry, 1665).

Jobe, Thomas Harmon. “The Devil in Restoration Science: The Glanvill-Webster Witchcraft Debate.” Isis 72.263(September 1981):343–356.

Keller, Evelyn Fox. A Feeling for the Organism: The Life and Work of Barbara McClintock. New York and San Francisco: W. H. Freeman and Company, 1983.

-----. “Women and Science: Two Cultures or One?: Commentary on Hein, Lowe, Fee and Goodman and Goodman.” International Journal of Women’s Studies 4.4(September/October 1981):414–419.

King, Ynestra. “Toward an Ecological Feminism and a Feminist Ecology.” In Machina Ex Dea: Feminist Perspectives on Technology. Ed. Joan ROthSChild. New York: Pergamon Press, 1983, 118–129.

Kinnaird, Joan K. “Mary Astell and the Conservative Contribution to English Feminism.” The Journal of British Studies 19.1(Fall 1979):53–75.

Kuhn, Thomas. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 2nd ed. 1962; rpt. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1971.

Lange, Lynda. “Woman Is Not a Rational Animal: On Aristotle’s Biology of Reproduction.” In Discovering Reality: Feminist Perspectives on Epistemology, Metaphysics, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science. Eds. Sandra Harding and Merrill B. Hintikka. Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel Publishing Company, 1983, 1–15.

De Lauretis, Teresa. “Signs of W[o/a]nder.” In The Technological Imagination: Theories and Fictions. Eds. Teresa De Lauretis, Andreas Huyssen, and Kathleen Woodward. Madison: Coda Press, Inc., 1980, 159–174.

LeGates, Marlene. “The Cult of Womanhood in Eighteenth-Century Thought.” Eighteenth-Century Studies 10.1(Fall 1976):21–39.

Lemay, Helen Rodnite. “Some Thirteenth and Fourteenth Century Lectures on Female Sexuality.” International Journal of Women’s Studies 1.4(July/August 1978):391–400.

Lougée, Carolyn C. Le Paradis des Femmes: Women, Salons, and Social Stratification in Seventeenth-Century France. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1976.

Lowe, Marian. “Cooperation and Competition in Science.” International Journal of Women’s Studies 4.4(September/October 1981):362–368.

MacCarthy, B. G. Women Writers: Their Contribution to The English Novel, 1621–1744. 3rd ed. 1944; rpt. Oxford: B. H. Blackwell, Ltd., 1946.

Merchant, Carolyn [a.k.a. Carolyn Iltis]. The Death of Nature: Women, Ecology, and the Scientific Revolution. 1980; rpt. New York: Harper & Row, 1983.

Meyer, Gerald Dennis. The Scientific Lady in England, 1650–1760: An Account of Her Rise, with Emphasis on the Major Roles of the Telescope and Microscope. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1955.

Moulton, Janice. “A Paradigm of Philosophy: The Adversary Method.” In Discovering Reality: Feminist Perspectives on Epistemology, Metaphysics, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science. Eds. Sandra Harding and Merrill B. Hintikka. Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel Publishing Company, 1983, 149–164.

Mumford, Lewis. “Authoritarian and Democratic Technics.” Technology and Culture 5.1(Winter 1964):1–8.

Nicolson, Marjorie Hope, ed. Conway Letters: The Correspondence of Anne, Viscountess Conway, Henry More, and their Friends, 1642–1684. Collected from Manuscript Sources & Edited with a Biographical Account. 1930; rpt. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1934.

-----. Voyages to the Moon. 2nd ed. 1948; rpt. New York: The Macmillan Company, 1960.

Nussbaum, Felicity A. The Brink of All We Hate: English Satires on Women, 1660–1750. Lexington: The University Press of Kentucky, 1984.

Perry, Henry Ten Eyck. The First Duchess of Newcastle and Her Husband as Figures in Literary History. Boston and London: Ginn and Company, 1918; rpt. New York and London: Johnson Reprint Corporation, 1968.

Plumb, J. H. “Commercialization and Society.” Part 3 in The Birth of a Consumer Society: The Commercialization of Eighteenth-Century England. By Neil McKendrick, John Brewer, and J. H. Plumb. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1982.

Reynolds, Myra. The Learned Lady in England, 1650–1760. 1920; rpt. Gloucester, Massachusetts: Peter Smith, 1964.

Rogers, Katharine M. Feminism in Eighteenth-Century England. Urbana, Chicago, and London: University of Illinois Press, 1982.

Rothschild, Joan. “A Feminist Perspective on Technology and the Future.” Women’s Studies International Quarterly 4.1(1981):65–74.

Rousseau, George Sebastian, and Roy Porter, eds. “Introduction.” In The Ferment of Knowledge: Studies in the Historiography of Eighteenth-Century Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980.

Seidel, Michael A. “Poulain de la Barre’s The Woman as Good as the Man.” Journal of the History of Ideas 35.3(July–September 1974):499–508.

Shapiro, Barbara J. Probability and Certainty in Seventeenth-Century England: A Study of the Relationships between Natural Science, Religion, History, Law and Literature. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1983.

Smith, Hilda L. Reason’s Disciples: Seventeenth-Century English Feminists. Urbana, Chicago, and London: University of Illinois Press, 1982.

Stanley, Autumn. “Women Hold Up Two-Thirds of the Sky: Notes for a Revised History of Technology.” In Machina Ex Dea: Feminist Perspectives on Technology. Ed. Joan Rothschild. New York: Pergamon Press, 1983, 5–22.

Stimson, Dorothy. Scientists and Amateurs: A History of the Royal Society. 1948; rpt. New York: Greenwood Press, 1968.

Thackray, Arnold. “‘The Business of Experimental Philosophy’: the Early Newtonian Group at the Royal Society.” Actes du XIIe Congrès International d’Histoire des Sciences, III.B (Paris, 1970–1971), 155–159.

Webster, Charles. The Great Instauration: Science, Medicine and Reform 1626–1660. New York: Holmes & Meier Publishers, 1976.

Whitbeck, Caroline. “Theories of Sex Difference.” Philosophical Forum 5.1(Fall 1973):54–80.

Wilkins, John. The Discovery of a World in the Moone. Introd. Barbara J. Shapiro. Delmar, New York: Scholars’ Facsimiles and Reprints, 1973. Facs. rpt. of original edition (London: Printed by E. G. for M. Sparke and E. Forrest, 1638).

Zimmerman, Jan. “Technology and the Future of Women: Haven’t We Met Somewhere Before?” Women’s Studies International Quarterly 4.3(1981):355–367.